Auf Kommentar antworten

No term limits for Board members?

I am a bit concerned about Board members not terming out, ever.

In the organizations I've been involved with, the Board members always burn out (eventually), and often don't notice that they're doing it. Everyone's used to them being there, but that's not to the benefit of the group as a whole, and it blocks new members with new ideas and energy.

The other reason I'm concerned is that there's no scope for disagreement: if the majority of Board members are on one side of a dispute, they may not be properly representing the opinions of the membership. Unless there are term limits, the Board can block the issues, with no recourse ever. This is likely to cause people to leave the organization.

A term limit of 8 or 10 years is a good compromise: Board members can have the security of long-term planning, while insurgent members will not feel that the organization is always going to be exactly the same.

Please consider this, perhaps after this election. I didn't realize I felt so strongly about it, but organizational dysfunction is very common, and I'd like to see OTW avoid repeating old mistakes.

Sincerely,

Avi Rappoport, member.

Antworten

Der Inhalt dieses Feldes wird nicht öffentlich zugänglich angezeigt.
  • Zulässige HTML-Tags: <a> <big> <blockquote> <div> <cite> <code> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <img> <li> <ol> <pre> <small> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <ul> <var>
  • Zeilen und Absätze werden automatisch erzeugt.
  • Internet- und E-Mail-Adressen werden automatisch umgewandelt.
  • Glossary terms will be automatically marked with links to their descriptions. If there are certain phrases or sections of text that should be excluded from glossary marking and linking, use the special markup, [no-glossary] ... [/no-glossary]. Additionally, these HTML elements will not be scanned: a, abbr, acronym, b, cite, code, em, i, pre, strong.

Weitere Informationen über Formatierungsoptionen