I really think this is a problematic policy. If an archivist has dissociated their project from the archive, why is the archive continuing to work under their "brand"? I understand preserving the work already done, but I don't understand why the OTW reserves the right to continue with a competing product under the same name. If the OTW really likes the idea of the collection, I think that a new collection tag should be created, so that it's clear, even if you're surfing the collection from the archive side, and not the Open Doors side, that these additions post-original-collector are a fork of the project, and not the fork by the people chosen by the original maintainer of the project.
VDfvi OTW may choose to continue work on the collection
I really think this is a problematic policy. If an archivist has dissociated their project from the archive, why is the archive continuing to work under their "brand"? I understand preserving the work already done, but I don't understand why the OTW reserves the right to continue with a competing product under the same name. If the OTW really likes the idea of the collection, I think that a new collection tag should be created, so that it's clear, even if you're surfing the collection from the archive side, and not the Open Doors side, that these additions post-original-collector are a fork of the project, and not the fork by the people chosen by the original maintainer of the project.