Commercialization of Fans

  • Links Roundup 11 July 2011

    By .fcoppa on Monday, 11 July 2011 - 9:53pm
    Message type:

    Here’s a roundup of stories that might be of interest to fans: articles about professional fanart, technology meant to control fans, interactive fan sites, erotic fan fiction and sexuality, new models for fan-TPTB collaboration, and fans as transmedia specialists, all beneath the cut!

    * Just Don't Call It Fanart. Salon did a fascinating article on an ongoing art show called "Crazy 4 Cult" which features artists making work based on movie stills. The show is patronized by the likes of Kevin Smith, Quentin Tarentino, Samuel L. Jackson and others. But, Salon warns, "Just don't call it 'fan art.'" (It sounds to us a lot like fan art.)

    * Who Controls Your Camera? The Electronic Frontier Foundation recently posted about the implications of Apple's new patent: a camera that can be turned off by a third party. The idea is to stop fans from, say, capturing "illegal images" at a rock concert. The EFF points out that this repression of fans is bad enough, but also asks us also to imagine how that technology might be used in an era where portable cameras have been used to document and publicize civil rights abuses and spread important news all around the world. Who gets to decide what you can record?

    * Interactive Sites Before Pottermore. There have been many stories these last few weeks about Pottermore, J.K. Rowling's new interactive Harry Potter site, but here's an article about some other explicitly pro-fanfiction and pro-interactivity authors who have put together creative sandboxes for their fans.

    * Elmer Fudd vs. Miss Marple? This review of A Billion Wicked Thoughts, a book which uses erotic fan fiction and other online materials to draw conclusions about human sexuality, critiques the book on many fronts, but most notably from a lesbian perspective: "Is the near total silence about this quadrant of human desire because the authors couldn't fit lesbians into their thesis?"

    * No Endorsement; Endless Possibilities: Cory Doctorow, thinking through the implication of creating "ODOs" or On-Demand Objects, imagines a world where creators and owners could give fans a "no endorsement" license to make and sell derivative (not transformative!) works. The maker would automatically cut in the creator/owner for a stipulated percent of any profit.

    * Transmedia 2: Electric Bugaloo: Henry Jenkins has posted footage from all four panels of this spring's Transmedia Hollywood 2 conference. There was discussion of fan culture and works throughout the conference, with many panelists believing that fans have acknowledged expertise in transmedia storytelling, and others debating how best to engage fans in this new multi-modal world. (OTW Board Member Francesca Coppa was on the second panel to talk explicitly about fan works and characterization.)

    We want your suggestions! If you know of an essay, video, article, event, or link you think we should know about you can submit it in three easy ways: comment on the most recent Link Roundup on transformativeworks.org, LJ, or DW, tag a link with "for:otw_news" on Delicious or give @OTW_News a shoutout on Twitter. Links are welcome in all languages!

    Submitting a link doesn't guarantee that it will be included in a roundup post, and inclusion of a link doesn't mean that it is endorsed by the OTW.

  • LOTR and Twilight Fan Fiction Archives Bought - For Profit

    By .fcoppa on Friday, 1 July 2011 - 5:54pm
    Message type:

    Two fan archives in The Lord of the Rings and Twilight fandoms — LOTRfanfiction.com and The Twilight Archives — have been bought by a web developer named Keith Mander, who plans to develop these archives' features and to generate profit by increasing traffic and adding advertising.

    In a FAQ posted to LOTRfanfiction.com, Mr. Mander states that "The site will never become a cash cow, the intention is only to cover costs and facilitate future investment into the site." However, in a post on Dreamwidth, fan esteliel quotes from Mr. Mander's personal blog that his business plan is "to directly contact site owners who are unaware of their site’s value," and "to concentrate on topics that are not immediately commercial in nature as you’re more likely to discover a site created out of passion, rather than for profit."

    First, to reassure those authors with works on these sites: we believe that people who create fanworks without making money from them are engaging in noncommercial fair uses, no matter where they post those fanworks. Just because your noncommercial fanwork is on an ad-supported site (including for instance a LiveJournal Plus account or on YouTube) does not mean your work is any less of a fair use. If you have any legal concerns about your work now or in the future, please contact the OTW and we will do our best to help you regardless if your work is on an ad-supported site or not.

    However, there are clearly grounds for concern for the users of these sites, and we at OTW want to offer whatever support we can.

    What we're doing right now:

    * Our coders are already working on a custom importer to make it easier and quicker for writers to import their stories from these sites and back them up or transfer them to the Archive of Our Own. Our next deploy is coming soon and will hopefully include this update.

    * If you are a user of these archives and don't already have an AO3 account, you can sign up for an AO3 invitation, or contact our Open Doors team, who will have accounts ready to give away.

    Please boost the signal on this to users of these archives if you can!

    We also want to add that we do ourselves feel that this sale is a risky thing for these archives and for their users. Many of us at the OTW are ourselves fandom archivists, and we know how hard it is for a single individual to keep a site running even with the best of intentions. When an archive is intended to be a profit-making venture for the person running it, it then becomes dependent not just on a single person, but also on the archive being profitable (and not more trouble than it's worth). As Mr. Mander says, he needs an "income stream" to justify investing in the site. So this raises the question of what happens to the site if it's not profitable or if the site as a whole gets a legal threat, or what will happen if some content on the site troubles advertisers.

    In a posted response to Mander, esteliel says that she "did not agree that my stories will earn money for the owner of this website when I signed up for the archive," and reiterates she sees her stories as a gift to fandom. This is a feeling that many of us share, and which the OTW is committed to supporting. Fans have provided decades of labor and creativity without outside investors. Many users object in principle to having profit generated by monetizing their fanworks, and many users who put their work on these archives in the expectation that the archives themselves were labors of love by other fans are not interested in having their work taken over by a for-profit business.

    The OTW will keep working to preserve a robust and lasting home for fanworks and fan cultures, regardless of whether or not a particular fandom provides a revenue stream. For individual archivists who are overwhelmed by the work of supporting an archive, please consider contacting us for assistance.

  • Links Roundup for February 1, 2011

    By .fcoppa on Wednesday, 2 February 2011 - 3:07am
    Message type:

    Here's a roundup of recent stories that might be of interest to fans.

    * The New York Times ran a skeptical editorial upon hearing that the Conan Doyle Estate has commissioned a new, "authorized" Sherlock Holmes novel, since the Holmes stories are out of copyright in the UK and mostly out of copyright in the U.S. As the article notes, "there is no reason why an 'official' 21st-century Holmes story will be any better...than an 'unofficial' one," and concludes, "We shudder to think what the Shakespeare Estate might be endorsing now."

    * In Japan, the supreme court has ruled that a service which transfers TV to overseas viewers is illegal. This reverses earlier rulings that the service did not violate copyright law.

    *Political remixer Jonathan McIntosh has put together an HTML5 video demo using Mozilla's Popcorn.js framework in order to create an annotated remix: that is, a version in which remixers can cite sources or add footnotes. McIntosh, who believes that a transparent citing of sources might strengthen fair use claims, also offering his code, skin, and design files to anyone who wants to use them.

    We want your suggestions! If you know of an essay, video, article, event, or link you think we should know about you can submit it in three easy ways: comment on the most recent Link Roundup on LJ, IJ or DW, tag a link with "for:otw_news" on Delicious or give @OTW_News a shoutout on Twitter. Links are welcome in all languages!

    Submitting a link doesn't guarantee that it will be included in a roundup post, and inclusion of a link doesn't mean that it is endorsed by the OTW.

Pages

Subscribe to Commercialization of Fans