Fannish Communities

  • Links Roundup for 26 August 2011

    By Claudia Rebaza on Friday, 26 August 2011 - 5:22pm
    Message type:

    Here's a roundup of stories about pseudonyms online that might be of interest to fans:

    • Google's decision to restrict its new + accounts to people using their legal names has resulted in a variety of protests from affected groups. The My Name is Me project has collected thousands of posts from online users who support choice in how a person identifies themselves, including OTW Board members Francesca Coppa and Rachel Barenblat, The Velveteen Rabbi. Social media scholar danah boyd called the effort to police self-identification as "an authoritarian assertion of power over vulnerable people." Both she and the My Name is Me page list a number of groups negatively affected by such policies including fans.
    • In a different look at the advantages of pseudonymity, author Hanne Blank discusses how difficult she finds it to accept praise for her professionally known work, but is greatly cheered to get comments on her fanfic posts from people she doesn't know, and who don't know her -- a contrast many fans may be familiar with.

    We want your suggestions! If you know of an essay, video, article, event, or link you think we should know about, comment on the most recent Links Roundup — on transformativeworks.org, LJ, or DW — or give @OTW_News a shoutout on Twitter. Links are welcome in all languages!

    Submitting a link doesn't guarantee that it will be included in a roundup post, and inclusion of a link doesn't mean that it is endorsed by the OTW.

  • LOTR and Twilight Fan Fiction Archives Bought - For Profit

    By .fcoppa on Friday, 1 July 2011 - 5:54pm
    Message type:

    Two fan archives in The Lord of the Rings and Twilight fandoms — LOTRfanfiction.com and The Twilight Archives — have been bought by a web developer named Keith Mander, who plans to develop these archives' features and to generate profit by increasing traffic and adding advertising.

    In a FAQ posted to LOTRfanfiction.com, Mr. Mander states that "The site will never become a cash cow, the intention is only to cover costs and facilitate future investment into the site." However, in a post on Dreamwidth, fan esteliel quotes from Mr. Mander's personal blog that his business plan is "to directly contact site owners who are unaware of their site’s value," and "to concentrate on topics that are not immediately commercial in nature as you’re more likely to discover a site created out of passion, rather than for profit."

    First, to reassure those authors with works on these sites: we believe that people who create fanworks without making money from them are engaging in noncommercial fair uses, no matter where they post those fanworks. Just because your noncommercial fanwork is on an ad-supported site (including for instance a LiveJournal Plus account or on YouTube) does not mean your work is any less of a fair use. If you have any legal concerns about your work now or in the future, please contact the OTW and we will do our best to help you regardless if your work is on an ad-supported site or not.

    However, there are clearly grounds for concern for the users of these sites, and we at OTW want to offer whatever support we can.

    What we're doing right now:

    * Our coders are already working on a custom importer to make it easier and quicker for writers to import their stories from these sites and back them up or transfer them to the Archive of Our Own. Our next deploy is coming soon and will hopefully include this update.

    * If you are a user of these archives and don't already have an AO3 account, you can sign up for an AO3 invitation, or contact our Open Doors team, who will have accounts ready to give away.

    Please boost the signal on this to users of these archives if you can!

    We also want to add that we do ourselves feel that this sale is a risky thing for these archives and for their users. Many of us at the OTW are ourselves fandom archivists, and we know how hard it is for a single individual to keep a site running even with the best of intentions. When an archive is intended to be a profit-making venture for the person running it, it then becomes dependent not just on a single person, but also on the archive being profitable (and not more trouble than it's worth). As Mr. Mander says, he needs an "income stream" to justify investing in the site. So this raises the question of what happens to the site if it's not profitable or if the site as a whole gets a legal threat, or what will happen if some content on the site troubles advertisers.

    In a posted response to Mander, esteliel says that she "did not agree that my stories will earn money for the owner of this website when I signed up for the archive," and reiterates she sees her stories as a gift to fandom. This is a feeling that many of us share, and which the OTW is committed to supporting. Fans have provided decades of labor and creativity without outside investors. Many users object in principle to having profit generated by monetizing their fanworks, and many users who put their work on these archives in the expectation that the archives themselves were labors of love by other fans are not interested in having their work taken over by a for-profit business.

    The OTW will keep working to preserve a robust and lasting home for fanworks and fan cultures, regardless of whether or not a particular fandom provides a revenue stream. For individual archivists who are overwhelmed by the work of supporting an archive, please consider contacting us for assistance.

  • Still flying: Firefly fans' creativity transcends cancellation

    By Kristen Murphy on Friday, 11 March 2011 - 6:40pm
    Message type:

    Actor Nathan Fillion, who played Capt. Malcolm Reynolds in the 2002 television series Firefly and its sequel film, Serenity, said in a recent interview: "If I got $300 million from the California Lottery, the first thing I would do is buy the rights to Firefly, make it on my own, and distribute it on the Internet." Following this remark, Firefly fans swiftly moved into action, launching a Web site and Facebook page to gauge fan support for funding a buyout. Almost 12,000 fans responded, pledging more than one million U.S. dollars total.

    Reactions to the movement were mixed. Some commentators speculated that a successful buyout could revolutionize the studio system of television production, while others expressed doubt that 20th Century Fox would be willing to part with the rights to Firefly regardless of how much money was pledged.

    The project has now halted, but the momentum it gained in only two weeks demonstrates the passion, creativity, and capacity for swift mobilization that are hallmarks of fandom. Yet it bears pointing out that a revival of Firefly — or any other cancelled series — is not necessary for fannish creativity to thrive. Firefly fandom is clearly alive and well. Browncoats: Redemption, a fan-produced Firefly film with proceeds benefiting charity, premiered in 2010 amid great excitement from fans. There are nearly 1,700 Firefly fanworks in the Archive of Our Own, and many more elsewhere on the Web. Such fannish interpretations will continue to be produced, for fun and for free, regardless of who owns the series' production rights or whether new episodes are being aired.

    The passion and creativity of fans transcends the bounds of cancellation. To paraphrase Mal Reynolds in Serenity, love is what keeps fandom in the air, and that love can endure decades after its source texts.

  • Dutch fansites may be criminalised by users discussing movie and TV show downloads

    By .Helka Lantto on Wednesday, 3 November 2010 - 8:57pm
    Message type:

    Written by Tanaqui

    Dutch fansites may be criminalised if their users mention the existence of copyrighted material on the internet, even if they don't link directly to it, despite it not being illegal to download copyrighted content in the Netherlands for personal use.

    The development comes as part of a long-running battle between Dutch Usenet community FTD and Dutch anti-piracy organisation Bescherming Rechten Entertainment Industrie Nederland (BREIN).

    FTD, the largest Usenet community in the Netherlands, allows its 450,000 users to create “spots” or reports indicating the file names of uploads or the names of the Usenet groups or other sites where they can be found. In June, a Dutch court ruled that by allowing users to provide sufficient details about the existence of uploads of a movie to allow other users to find them, FTD was effectively publishing the movie as if it had actually hosted the movie on its own servers. Following this ruling, BREIN asked the court to impose a fine on FTD for every day it continues to operate.

    Earlier in 2010, BREIN declared FTD's operations "illegal", despite FTD having entered into discussions with BREIN over "spots" during 2009 and having co-operated in making some changes to its operations to ensure there was no doubt about their legality.

    In response, FTD has taken BREIN to court to clear its name and prevent the fines being enforced. FTD's case is that its users are merely pointing to content uploaded by others which, under Dutch law, they may legally download, and that directing users to online content is legal, even if the material was put there without permission of the copyright holders.

    In court, BREIN has argued that the users providing "spots" are the same ones uploading the content they are posting about. (Uploading copyrighted content is illegal in the Netherlands.) FTD strongly contests BREIN's claim and is now claiming in turn that it has identified undercover investigators hired by or directly employed by BREIN posing as FTD members who have uploaded content and posted "spots" in an attempt to provide proof for BREIN's claims and to discredit FTD.

    A ruling in the case, which could have widespread implications for Dutch providers of internet services and websites, is expected in November.

  • TWC Editor Kristina Busse: Special Guest At WriterCon

    By .fcoppa on Monday, 10 August 2009 - 4:07am
    Message type:

    Transformative Works and Cultures editor Kristina Busse was one of the special guests at WriterCon 2009, where she gave several talks, including the keynote, Affect and the Individual Fan:The Role of Genre and Tropes in Writer Creativity and Reader Engagement, and a presentation on "Genderswap and Feminism". Kristina also gave a talk about the OTW for a panel called, "If You Build It, They Will Come: How the Internet Builds Communities Around Fanfic": the full text of this overview is now available online.

Pages

Subscribe to Fannish Communities