Takedowns

  • The Rebellious Pixels Chain of Takedowns

    By Claudia Rebaza on Monday, 14 January 2013 - 12:42am
    Message type:

    Last week remix artist Jonathan McIntosh had a troubling story to tell which put a spotlight on the current problems facing transformative works creators. In our current environment of automated copyright claims and the layers of entities users may have to go through to assert fair use rights, it takes real dedication sometimes to be heard.

    McIntosh's work, Buffy vs. Edward, is a well known video which has, as he cites in his post, been used on numerous occasions in academic settings. It is also among the Test Suite of Fair Use Vids that the OTW assembled as part of their successful case for a renewal of the DMCA exemption for vidders.

    McIntosh details months of effort to get his video reinstated which would, ironically, have been much simpler had he been making an effort to profit from the video. It was because ad placements have been disabled on his account that he was targeted by a subcontractor for Lionsgate, MovieClips, to either permit them or have the video deleted. Yet as a matter of U.S. copyright law, the non-commercial nature of Jonathan's video bolsters its status as copyright fair use.

    Though his video was eventually reinstated, it’s striking how much effort McIntosh had to put into dealing with the problem. Jonathan's video has been cited by the U.S. Copyright Office as an example of transformative fair use, yet he has had to defend it from numerous attacks and accusations. For every artist like him who is very familiar with the law and is willing to fight for his rights again and again, how many people are simply seeing their work disappear?

    This is one of the reasons we can see chilling effects, especially since this situation is a reminder that even clear cases of fair use aren’t safe from this kind of action. In fact, it appears that the video that was the subject of Lenz v. Universal, the case that established that copyright holders have to consider whether something is fair use before sending a DMCA take down notice, has once again been removed due to a copyright claim –- and this was a video which has already been litigated and determined to be fair use.

    The OTW wants to remind fans that its legal advocacy project is a possible resource for someone who finds themselves in a situation where their work has received takedown notices, and offers recommendations for vidders in particular on our Fan Video and Multimedia section of our website.

  • OTW Fannews: Technology and Legal Matters

    By Claudia Rebaza on Saturday, 5 January 2013 - 5:10pm
    Message type:
    • A piece in the New York Times examined how technology, and those creating it, are censoring the Internet. "The New Yorker found its Facebook page blocked for violating the site’s nudity and sex standards. Its offense: a cartoon of Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden. Eve’s bared nipples failed Facebook’s decency test. That’s right — a venerable publication that still spells “re-elect” as “reëlect” is less puritan than a Californian start-up that wants to “make the world more open.”" The article cites numerous companies at fault, the most influential being Google. "Until recently, even the word “bisexual” wouldn’t autocomplete at Google." While some cases are a matter of cultural conflict, others show corporate influence. "How do you teach the idea of “fair use” to an algorithm?"
    • The Daily Dot looked at just such a problem by investigating how Google's automated search for copyright violations ends up being anything from a nuisance to censorship of people creating or using royalty-free content. "Miller's saga...led him through the depths of EMI Music and Warner/Chappell Music, two labels that showed up as having management rights to the track. But when Miller made the necessary efforts to contact the labels, he learned that neither of the two actually held any rights to the song. In both cases, the two creators lost their ability to pull revenue from the ads that ran on their videos. Instead, those dollars—or pennies, as Mullins articulated—went to the purported rights holders of each composition—something that's not technically fair, if at all ethical—until the channel owner’s able to straighten out the situation. That can sometimes take days, weeks, or in Mullins case with the guitar stringing videos, not happen at all."
    • Knowledge at Wharton posted a video interview and transcript with information management professor Shawndra Hill on the topic of Social TV which is "the integration of social media and TV programming" designed to capture fan activity. "There are a number of [successful] social TV applications that have been developed by [several] businesses to allow people to basically show how big a fan they are of different TV shows...So networks in the U.S., at least, have ways for their viewers to interact with one another on the networks' websites and in fact are trying to drive them to their own websites to do just that."

    If you have technology or legal stories relating to fandom, why not share them on Fanlore? Contributions are welcome from all fans.

    We want your suggestions! If you know of an essay, video, article, podcast, or link you think we should know about, comment on the most recent OTW Fannews post. Links are welcome in all languages! Submitting a link doesn't guarantee that it will be included in a roundup post, and inclusion of a link doesn't mean that it is endorsed by the OTW.

  • Links roundup for 26 June 2012

    By Claudia Rebaza on Tuesday, 26 June 2012 - 3:07pm
    Message type:

    Here's a roundup of fan fiction in peril stories that might be of interest to fans:

    • At the beginning of June, fan discussion began to be seen at numerous sites raising the alarm over fanfic disappearing from Fanfiction.net (FFN). These actions were attributed to a vocal group of critics among FFN users who wanted to drive the site to enforce the content policy it put in place in 2001 and 2002, which caused the first wave of fans to leave the site. While some users protested the validity of the site's actions, and grassroots efforts such as petitions have been started, to date there is no certain explanation of what prompted the new wave of takedowns.
    • One response by fans has been the creation of new multifandom fanfic archives or increased traffic directed to existing sites, including the OTW's own AO3. However the size of the user base at FFN and the number of people affected make it unlikely that existing sites will be able to easily absorb the quantity of fans seeking new locations for their work. Wikinews has created an ongoing story of the reactions by fans on various fronts.
    • The actions at FFN have largely been ignored by the wider media. One exception has been a story at the Huffington Post which called attention to this failure in coverage. "If the only difference between a piece of fanfiction and a bestselling novel is the changing of character names and places, then is the mass deletion of thousands of stories without warning something that should be bigger news than a handful of Tumblr posts? There is a cultural hierarchy of taste at play here, one which places fanfiction as lowbrow geek fodder undeserving of any real attention. Were a library filled with thousands of works of 'legitimate' fiction destroyed, it would make front-page news." While focusing on the effects of the lost fanfic, not mentioned in the piece was the loss to the authors of response to their works which, unlike the work itself, would not be able to recreated at another site, or the loss to readers of bookmarked works which they might be able to return to or recommend to others. In short, the community aspect of reading and writing in a particular location is a key factor in what is being lost.

    If you're a fan fiction writer or have used FanFiction.net, why not contribute to Fanlore? Additions are welcome from all fans.

    We want your suggestions! If you know of an essay, video, article, event, or link you think we should know about, comment on the most recent Links Roundup — on transformativeworks.org, LJ, or DW — or give @OTW_News a shoutout on Twitter. Links are welcome in all languages!

    Submitting a link doesn't guarantee that it will be included in a roundup post, and inclusion of a link doesn't mean that it is endorsed by the OTW.

  • Links roundup for 19 June 2012

    By Claudia Rebaza on Tuesday, 19 June 2012 - 5:21pm
    Message type:

    Here's a roundup of media use stories that might be of interest to fans:

    • The French model three strikes law against those downloading copyrighted content has been delayed in the U.S. -- for now. "The proposed Copyright Alerts system has been delayed to an unspecified date. Often referred to as “Six Strikes and You’re Out,” the policy was supposed to have been implemented in July 2012. Under it, Internet service providers like Time Warner and Verizon would voluntarily punish their customers who repeatedly use peer-to-peer filesharing software to illegally download copyrighted material." So far the French law has reduced illegal downloading but hasn't boosted media sales the way its sponsors wanted.
    • Speaking of downloading, more U.S. fans will run into online restrictions in 2012. C|Net wrote about Verizon and Comcast enacting data caps. "The sad reality is that while it's a great market penetration strategy, unlimited data is simply not a sustainable economic model," said Guy Rosen, CEO of Onavo, a wireless application that helps people control data usage. "Supply is limited by the laws of physics and demand is simply exploding. Verizon's statement adds to AT&T's throttling debacle of earlier this year, ushering us into a future where all data has a price tag. It's now clear that operators will find any loophole they can to eradicate grandfathered unlimited contracts." Most of the heavy use is blamed on "video, particularly high-definition video. Services like Netflix, Hulu, and Youtube account for huge amounts of traffic on the network."
    • Meanwhile one particularly popular video was taken down from YouTube temporarily due to copyright claims. "Rickrolling is the practice of promising a victim one link but directing them instead to Rick Astley’s 1987 music video, 'Never Gonna Give You Up,' instead." The takedown was particularly odd given the longevity of rickrolling and how "On April Fools' Day in 2008, [YouTube itself] rickrolled viewers by redirecting every video on the front page to Astley’s video." The video was later restored with no explanation.
    • Lastly, major league baseball is sponsoring social media nights at its games. The events "vary from ballpark to ballpark, but some aspects are fairly consistent. The Cubs offered specially priced tickets and put together contests for their online fans. They encouraged their Twitter followers to use the hashtag (hash)CubsSocial to mark their tweets throughout the night. Other teams "hold in-game scavenger hunts that award autographed memorabilia or team apparel, and some clubs put together contests that result in upgraded tickets for their online followers." Other teams follow people's special events and surprise them with gift packs at the stadiums. "It's about fan engagement and the ability then to be able to enter into that discussion, and not being too corporate, but helping lead and participate in that conversation," Nationals chief operating officer Andy Feffer said. "Why? Because the social media platform is now an access point — to the club, to the players, to promotions, to ticket sales, to the story that's being told. And the story really lives now in the social media world."

    If you're a baseball fan, or follow copyright issues, why not contribute to Fanlore? Additions are welcome from all fans.

    We want your suggestions! If you know of an essay, video, article, event, or link you think we should know about, comment on the most recent Links Roundup — on transformativeworks.org, LJ, or DW — or give @OTW_News a shoutout on Twitter. Links are welcome in all languages!

    Submitting a link doesn't guarantee that it will be included in a roundup post, and inclusion of a link doesn't mean that it is endorsed by the OTW.

  • Links Roundup for 1 June 2012

    By Camden on Friday, 1 June 2012 - 6:12pm
    Message type:

    Here's a roundup of fan fiction and Fifty Shades of Grey stories that might be of interest to fans:

    • Months after its re-release, Fifty Shades of Grey continues to make news in the most unexpected of ways, including some hastily written articles that prove strangely uninformative. These include an episode of the Dr. Oz show that used the book to focus on the science of arousal; various features pointing out how men like the trilogy too; both Glibert Gottfried and Ellen DeGeneres did readings from it; an article focusing on the hero's home ("[Director of Sales Erik] Mehr said that about a year ago, his team began to get phone calls from people who wanted to know 'the layouts of the penthouse and the details of the condos.'...When the Escala held open houses, visitors included 'Fifty Shades' fans who wandered about, checking on the amenities and basic floor models."); and a discussion of a fanfic remix as well as an interview with the author of a published parody who notes "'Fifty Shames,'...paid more than my first two books that took several years to write. It’s just kind of mind-boggling to me."
    • Also boggled are the book's original publishers Amanda Hayward and Jennifer Pedroza, who were featured in a story about the international connections between the publishers and author. "Amanda and I met online through fan fiction," said Pedroza..."We realized we had some really good writers so we started The Writers Coffee Shop (in October 2010)." The venture is doing well. "The Writers Coffee Shop will still receive royalties for the next three years, Pedroza said, enough to convince her to retire from teaching and focus on publishing for awhile." A post by obsidianwings also looked at the issue of publishing in relation to the book and suggested that fandom is becoming mainstream publishing's slush pile reader.
    • The issue of literary quality is something examined by The Record in "'50 Shades' another brick in the wall between fans and critics". "These days, anyone can write a book – or at least be credited with writing one. Biographies, autobiographies, novels and cookbooks are published based on reality-TV success, athletic victories or, in James' case, Internet fan fiction gone viral. Readers want to be part of the discussion with their friends, whether it's a well-regarded look back in history or a racy romance that may not be well-written. Concerns of the critics are not a priority...Many reviewers hated 'Bridges of Madison County,' 'The DaVinci Code' and 'Eat, Pray, Love,' yet the public loved them all, as books and as movies."
    • A Florida library is refusing to put '50 Shades' on their shelves--though technically, it's in good literary company as a banned book. Brevard County, Florida spokesman Don Walker told the New York Daily News "'We don't put pornography on our bookshelves,' branding the book 'mommy porn' before admitting, 'I'm not sure what that is.'" Perhaps the bans allow libraries to avoid spending money on the many copies needed to satisfy reader demand. A Miami New Times blogger noted that not only is "Every single [copy] checked out. What's amazing is that there are currently 450 holds on the book." He then compared this to other popular books in the system and noted that "The only book that rivals Fifty Shades in Miami-Dade Library's most popular list at the moment seems to be The Hunger Games."
    • Lastly there's been discussion of fan fiction itself, particularly in college newspapers. One of these, The Daily Collegian, published a two-part article that included an interview with OTW board member, Francesca Coppa. And BlackBook listed "Superstars of Fan Fiction," including OTW board member, Naomi Novik.

    If you write or read fan fiction, why not contribute to Fanlore? Additions are welcome from all fans.

    We want your suggestions! If you know of an essay, video, article, event, or link you think we should know about, comment on the most recent Links Roundup — on transformativeworks.org, LJ, or DW — or give @OTW_News a shoutout on Twitter. Links are welcome in all languages!

    Submitting a link doesn't guarantee that it will be included in a roundup post, and inclusion of a link doesn't mean that it is endorsed by the OTW.

  • Links roundup for 21 May 2012

    By Claudia Rebaza on Monday, 21 May 2012 - 9:57pm
    Message type:

    Here's a roundup of stories about fandom under pressure that might be of interest to fans:

    • In some of the latest takedown actions from the past month a fan offering free high-resolution downloads of his artwork for video game Fallout was contacted by a law firm representing the game owner Bethesda, issuing a cease and desist for his website. The artist replied in detail to the charges and has so far refused to turn his domain name over to the company, although he did remove links to the posters.
    • Popular website TV Tropes removed fanfiction recommendations on their site after encountering problems with Google's Ad Sense which required them to remove "mature and adult content" from the site. Aside from the issue of advertiser control of content, however, others were upset about what it meant for their use of the site. As one poster commented "The problem, as I see it, is that the admins have destroyed countless hours of our work. I don't demand that pages be restored onto this particular server, but I do demand that the source material (pages as they existed pre-cut) be made available in some fashion, so that those who want can host it elsewhere."
    • In many places, online access to content isn't affected by advertisers or corporate owners, but by governments. For example, Vietnamese authorities have recently mandated that Internet companies assist in online censorship. Among the provisions of a proposed decree, "Internet users 'are strictly prohibited' from providing fictitious personal data" which will prohibit all forms of anonymous blogging and discussion. Personal blogs will have to publicize the name and contact information of the individual responsible and will be held personally liable for all the published content on their blogs.
    • On the other hand at least one sports blogger is alarmed at the possibility that team owners might put important decisions in fans' hands. "As counter-intuitive as it sounds, as much as the Sixers should care about making the fans happy, they shouldn't care about what those fans want on a Wednesday afternoon in the middle of a devastating losing streak. When they ask what the fans think about their roster, it isn't hip, catchy, or new-media savvy. It's insulting." Instead the blogger suggests, "continue to ask us what we think of a new lighting scheme, insist on our thoughts about a moose for a mascot, and call our home phones to ask how to make better use of '1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Sixers.' Those are the some of the best elements of a new fan-owner partnership."

    If you have news of legal actions against fans or content takedowns, why not write about it on Fanlore? Additions are welcome from all fans.

    We want your suggestions! If you know of an essay, video, article, event, or link you think we should know about, comment on the most recent Links Roundup — on transformativeworks.org, LJ, or DW — or give @OTW_News a shoutout on Twitter. Links are welcome in all languages!

    Submitting a link doesn't guarantee that it will be included in a roundup post, and inclusion of a link doesn't mean that it is endorsed by the OTW.

  • Legal issues in the news

    By Claudia Rebaza on Saturday, 28 April 2012 - 9:48pm
    Message type:

    2012 is becoming the year of legislation and legal actions regarding Internet use. Earlier this year, proposed U.S. legislation known as SOPA and PIPA were shelved as a result of public outrage. Other actions were taken around the globe to protest ACTA, an international treaty still veiled in secrecy that also threatened to curtail the general public's activities and usage of online services.

    The latest controversial piece of legislation on this front is the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA), which was introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives on November 30, 2011 and has just been passed. Numerous groups are opposed to the bill such as the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the American Library Association, Free Press, and Canadian Internet Policy. The bill is also opposed by various politicans from President Obama to Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul, but is supported by companies such as telecom carriers Verizon, U.S. Telecom, and Sprint, and tech companies such as Facebook, Symantec, IBM and Oracle. The U.S. Senate has its own version of the bill which was previously endorsed by the White House, so it's still unclear in what form the bill may pass the Senate and whether or not that might be signed by President Obama.

    The Center for Democracy and Technology, which is opposed to CISPA, lists various problems with the legislation as it's currently drafted:

    1) CISPA has a very broad, almost unlimited definition of the information that can be shared with government agencies and it supersedes all other privacy laws.
    2) CISPA is likely to lead to expansion of the government’s role in the monitoring of private communications.
    3) CISPA is likely to shift control of government cybersecurity efforts from civilian agencies to the military.
    4) Once the information is shared with the government, it wouldn’t have to be used for cybersecurity, but could instead be used for other purposes.

    Given the Internet's current infrastructure, anything that affects Internet traffic in the U.S. can have implications for Internet freedoms around the globe. While some in the U.S. have decided to protest CISPA by drowning legislators in personal content, those who oppose the bill can also take a more traditional approach.

    A more encouraging story about online regulation has come from Australia, where their High Court refused to hold ISPs accountable for illegal downloading done through their services. The AFACT v. iiNet appeal was unanimously dismissed, with the court deciding against the case brought by movie companies including Australian branches of Hollywood studios Universal Pictures, Warner Bros. and 20th Century Fox.

    Holding providers liable for content posted or transmitted through their service has been a common tactic by content creators, whether of films or music. During the past week YouTube lost a court case in Germany where it was sued for royalties, and the court decided it "had not done enough to stop copyrighted clips being posted." Such cases are likely to continue around the globe in an effort to stifle consumer posting and transmission of content that music and film industry associations consider to be in violation of their ownership rights.

  • Links Roundup for 30 November 2011

    By Claudia Rebaza on Wednesday, 30 November 2011 - 4:25pm
    Message type:

    Here's a roundup of stories on corporate decision making affecting gamers that might be of interest to fans:

    • Scottish journalist Rachael Carmen Simpson reported on a video game freebie for the game Assassin’s Creed that was offered only to those using a male avatar. "Essentially this is the online equivalent of [her sister] Eleanor visiting a real life game shop offering free cloaks with a purchase and being told she can’t have one as she is the wrong gender."
    • Microsoft has made changes to its X-Box consoles that prevents people from playing pirated games. Microsoft "made the silent update without user consent and without many being aware that it actually took place at all" and there are concerns that Microsoft will follow this with mass bans. "The last time Microsoft had carried out mass ban [sic] was in 2009, when the company had banned Xbox Live accounts playing pirated versions of Halo Reach. The company also does not approve of consoles that have been modded by users."
    • A non-profit organization ""dedicated to the appreciation and promotion of video game music as an art form,"" had its YouTube account suspended. While asking their users to protest the decision, the community's manager stated "We're all volunteers, and all of the work we've done since 1999 on OverClocked ReMix is to help promote the art of video game music, as well as the great musicians who create the OC ReMixes, which have always been distributed for free and with the artists' permission.""

    If you are part of a gaming fandom or have experienced a YouTube takedown of your fannish work, why not share your experiences on Fanlore? Additions are welcome from all fans.

    We want your suggestions! If you know of an essay, video, article, event, or link you think we should know about, comment on the most recent Links Roundup — on transformativeworks.org, LJ, or DW — or give @OTW_News a shoutout on Twitter. Links are welcome in all languages!

    Submitting a link doesn't guarantee that it will be included in a roundup post, and inclusion of a link doesn't mean that it is endorsed by the OTW.

  • Links Roundup for 17 August 2011

    By .allison morris on Wednesday, 17 August 2011 - 6:23pm
    Message type:

    Here's a roundup of stories about literary and creative fandom that might be of interest to fans:

    • A first-person write-up of a woman's entry into online fandom and fan fiction writing was published in The Cultural Gutter this past month, and likely echoes the experience of many a fan, particularly those who take part in fan activities around LiveJournal and Dreamwidth.
    • An interesting discussion took place earlier this year on Language Log about the Tolkien estate's effort to censor use of the word "Tolkien", highlighting the problems fans may run into when creating fandom-related works. The fanartist on Zazzle who received the cease and desist order in the cited case countered the attack creatively, adding new items to their store which commented on the censorship effort.
    • Many discussions about copyright and trademark infringement revolve around the issue of intellectual theft. However, some professional artists are of the opinion that "theft" can never be left out of the creative process. In a post about his own creative history, artist and writer Austin Kleon suggests that the "genealogy of ideas" is a complex thing and will always reveal ties to other ideas and works — that's an idea close to the heart of fannish creativity, and we appreciate seeing it proclaimed from the professional side of the fence.

    If you have experienced events such as the case of the Tolkien fan discussed above, why not post them on Fanlore? These conflicts are a part of our history — help preserve it. Fanlore is open to contributions by all fans for any and all fandoms.

    We want your suggestions! If you know of an essay, video, article, event, or link you think we should know about you can submit it in three easy ways: comment on the most recent Links Roundup on transformativeworks.org, LJ or DW, or give @OTW_News a shoutout on Twitter. Links are welcome in all languages!

    This update was contributed by OTW Staff member Claudia Rebaza.

    Submitting a link doesn't guarantee that it will be included in a roundup post, and inclusion of a link doesn't mean that it is endorsed by the OTW.

  • Mixed Messages from YouTube’s "Copyright School"

    By .fcoppa on Thursday, 21 April 2011 - 12:32am
    Message type:

    by Rachael Vaughn and the OTW Legal Committee

    Last week, YouTube announced revisions to its copyright policy, which may impact vidders and other fans using YouTube. In short, YouTube has eliminated its one-size-fits-all three strike termination policy in favor of a revamped Copyright Education Center and an official Copyright School. Unfortunately, the Copyright School is presented in the form of a very one-sided tutorial cartoon that attempts to summarize a complicated and constantly evolving area of law using a teal squirrel in a pirate hat.

    Before discussing the content of the Copyright School video, it is useful to review how YouTube’s policy has actually changed. Known as the “three strikes rule,” YouTube’s old policy stipulated automatic suspension of user accounts receiving three uncontested copyright takedown notifications. It is important to differentiate between copyright takedown notifications and content ID matches (http://www.youtube.com/t/copyright_strike), which do not result in “strikes,” but may lead to uploads being automatically blocked. Only notifications from a copyright owner result in strikes. YouTube’s new policy retains the basic “three strikes” framework, but adds two additional provisions. First, if a user receives a copyright notification, the user is required to view the Copyright School video and pass a corresponding quiz. Second, YouTube may remove strikes from an account if the user: (1) successfully completes Copyright School; and (2) has demonstrated good behavior over time.

    As characterized in an informative post from EFF, the end result of the policy change is a bit of a “mixed bag” for YouTube users. The new rules will arguably result in fewer account suspensions, but at what price? In exchange for removing the infamous strikes that lead to account suspension, users must graduate from a Copyright School with a questionable pedigree.

    Although the Copyright School video does not explicitly make statements that are legally incorrect, it does employ a number of traditional scare tactics to dissuade users from uploading certain types of content. Mashups and remixes are two examples of content that is portrayed in a particularly unfavorable light. In the video, the pirate squirrel is repeatedly warned by a voice-of-god narrator about the harsh penalties associated with uploading video that is not 100% original. When the poor little guy tries to make a suitably original video by recording a band performing in a park with his phone, he is told that he will be subjected to a variety of punishments including jail, lawsuits, and getting smashed over the head with a giant gavel.

    The video’s explanation of fair use is relegated to a short section in which the narrator reads portions of the statute in a humorously fast voice while the animations on the screen are replaced with cramped text, suggesting that fair use is just mumbo jumbo that no ordinary person should try to understand. Users are advised that if they do not understand fair use, that they should seek the counsel of a copyright attorney. As one blogger points out: “all children have copyright lawyers, so this is a workable solution.” (http://copyrightlitigation.blogspot.com/2011/04/fair-use-fridays-youtube-flunks.html)

    Generally YouTube’s Copyright School does a fantastic job educating users about what cannot be done with copyrighted content. Unfortunately, it neglects to acknowledge that there are many situations in which copyrighted content can be lawfully transformed to further the promotion of science and the useful arts. In those situations, YouTube’s copyright dispute processes and the DMCA counter notification procedures are available. For more information, EFF’s Fair Use Principles for User Generated content and the Center for Social Media’s code of Best Practices in Fair Use for Online Video provide useful principles for ordinary videomakers considering fair use.

    But that might be telling stories out of school.

Pages

Subscribe to Takedowns